Growing Threats to Farming & Food

photo by ignacio-amenabar via unsplash.com

The Irish government has committed to a 25% reduction in agricultural gas emissions, which means a reduction in livestock and in farming as a way of life. As an incentive farmers are being offered €5000 per cow to cull their herds. Similar plans and incentives are being introduced in many countries accompanied by protests against them, most notably in the Netherlands and Sri Lanka.

The justification for these cuts, we are told, is the need to reduce and curb man made global warming. For years now we have been told, unequivocally, that man made global warming is a fact. Any doubts expressed about this are deemed heretical. Yet science, of its very nature, is never settled. In his book, Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact¹, philosospher of science, Ludwik Fleck tells us that:

Once a structurally complete and closed system of opinions consisting of many details and relations has been formed, it offers constant resistance to anything that contradicts it. […] What we are faced with here is not so much simple passivity or mistrust of new ideas as an active approach which can be divided into several stages. (1) A contradiction to the system seems unthinkable. (2) What does not fit into the system remains unseen; (3) alternatively, if it is noticed, either it is kept secret, or (4) laborious efforts are made to explain an exception in terms that do not contradict the system. (5) Despite the legitimate claims of contradictory views, one tends to see, describe, or even illustrate those circumstances which corroborate current views and thereby give them substance. (Fleck, 27)

James Corbett offers some serious critiques of the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis here. In his narrative James references Karl Popper’s theory of falsifiability to distinguish between science and pseudoscience. Also see here for a statement signed by over 1200 scientists and professionals arguing that there is no climate emergency and stating that “Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific. Scientists should openly address uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of global warming, while politicians should dispassionately count the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of their policy measures.“ F. William Engdahl in an article titled, The “Great Zero Carbon” Conspiracy and the WEF’s “Great Reset” quotes Dr. Alexander King, co-founder of The Club of Rome, from his book, The First Global Revolution, who said: “In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill … All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.”

At the same time as these campaigns to reduce farming, we are being warned of impending food shortages. But according to this article by Navdanya International there are no real food shortages; there is a food crisis by design:

What is crucially being overlooked by most diagnoses of the current food crisis is how the problem does not lie in a lack of supply, or lack of market integration, but instead in how the food system is structured around power.

Detailed in this new report by Navdanya International, is how, in fact, we have already been facing a food and malnutrition conflict long before the current conflict [Russia-Ukraine war].

From the colonial era, which saw the beginning of extraction and exploitation of small farmers, to the advent of the Green Revolution, and the concretizing of the globalized free trade regime, we have seen the deliberate destruction of small farmers and food sovereignty in favour of corporate power.

In a recent interview with Robert F. Kennedy jr., Christian WestBrook, The Ice Age Farmer, argued that the so called food shortages are part of a generations long plan which started with Rockfeller’s Green Revolution, see here, here, here and here, and is being continued by Bill Gates. According to Westbrook, the transhumanist technocrats want to sever our relationship to nature and to God; they want to replace meat with lab produced fake meat and organic farming with technocratic indoor farming. It’s a bid for total control, Westbrook says, and quotes Henry Kissinger’s famous line: “control oil and you control nations, control food and you control people”.

The dream of a technocratic future is the inspiration for the great reset – see here and here for a number of perspectives on the great reset – and for the events and actions which started in February, 2020 with the pseudopandemic which was then used to justify lockdowns, mask mandates, vaccine mandates, restrictions on the usual life activities for the unvaccinated, school closures, church closures, destruction of businesses and the resultant increases in unemployment, mental health problems, suicides and conflicts and divisions within families and among friends.  The attacks on farming and the orchestrated ‘food shortages’ are simply another phase of the same plan.

Patrick Wood, acknowledged Technocracy expert, author of numerous books on technocracy and Editor-in-Chief of technocracy.news, gives the following definition of technocracy in this interview with Joseph Mercola: “Technocracy is the science of social engineering, the scientific operation of the entire social mechanism to produce and distribute goods and services to the entire population“.

So the production and distribution of goods and services is the objective and, as elements of “the entire social mechanism” we are to be socially engineered so this can be brought about.  More effective management of our affairs might seem a desirable aim but, when it conflicts with our fundamental humanity and what it means to be a human person, that is, when it threatens our bodily and personal autonomy, our ability to interact and socialise with our fellow humans, our ability to roam freely and our ability to freely transact it must be resisted at any cost. As human beings we are free; without freedom we are no longer truly human, we are essentially slaves. This is precisely what the elites are now trying to impose on all of us.

According to Wood the intention is to craft a new international economic order. In the introduction to Technocracy Rising he tells us that “[w]ith the combined weight of the most powerful global elite behind it, Technocracy has flourished in the modern world and has perhaps reached the tipping point of no return.“²

For an introduction to technocracy see here.

In Pseudopandemic: New Normal Technocracy³, Iain Davis shows how the pseudopandemic was a pretext to facilitate the imposition of a system of technocratic global governance:

The core conspirators and informed influencers’ motivation for the pseudopandemic was to rapidly transition the world’s population into a new system of centralised, authoritarian global governance. This system is designed to be a technocracy and it is totalitarian. Many components of this global governance framework already exist.

The World Health Organisation (WHO) delivers global governance of health; global access to technological development is meted out through the World Intellectual Property Organization [1]; the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) works with partner State franchises to coordinate policy; global trade is monitored and controlled through the trade agreements overseen by the World Trade Organisation; the direction of education, academia, the sciences and cultural development is steered through the U.N. Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO); the parasite class‘ seizure of the global commons is nearing completion, using Sustainable Development Goals (SDG’s), primarily under the U.N. Development and Environment programs (UNDP & UNEP) and the necessary global scientific consensus on climate change is overseen by the U.N. body, the intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (224) (bold emphasis added)

As well as these global agencies’ influence on governments’ policies throughout the world, the World Economic Forum makes no secret of the fact that it has managed to infiltrate national governments with graduates of their young global leaders’ program. See here and here.

Our own Tánaiste, Leo Varadkar, is a graduate of this program.

If we are to have any hope of resisting the attempts to enslave us through various means – including severing us from each other, from nature, land and the cultivation of food – and ensuring that we can continue to live our lives as humans who are truly free, it is crucial that we understand what we’re up against. Global warming is a pretext for the destruction of traditional farming and, along with engineered food shortages, is designed to make us dependent on lab grown food. This is part of the overall plan to implement a tyrannical technocracy.

As Patrick Wood said in a recent conversation with Dr. Joseph Mercola: “Don’t just confine your view to the microcosm, like what’s in front of you. Always try and look for the big picture […]. Once you have the big picture, it’s hard to unsee it. Once you see it, it’s hard to not see it. It guides everything else you do within your life at that point, and that’s really important.“

Donagh Healy