Children As Collateral Damage: Killing And Injuring Our Most Vulnerable In The Name Of ‘Science’

Photo: A mass funeral protest for children who have died after receiving a Pfizer vaccine in Switzerland. From globalresearch.ca.

Mortality rates have increased dramatically around the world as covid ‘vaccines’ have been rolled out. Tragically children, pregnant women and nursing mothers were and are included in this ‘vaccine’ drive and have not been spared the injuries and deaths caused by the ‘vaccines’.

There are countless reports now clearly showing the link between ‘vaccination’ for covid-19 and serious injury or death. In this article I want to focus on the disrespect and contempt for the rights and humanity of children that is clearly evident from the behaviour of pharmaceutical companies and their enablers, national governments, including successive Irish governments, both in relation to covid-19 ‘vaccination’ and previous vaccine trials.

Dr. Naomi Wolf summarises the evidence of genocide here, telling us:

I’ve been rendered almost speechless — or the literary equivalent of that — because recently I’ve had the unenviable task of trying to announce to the world that indeed, a genocide — or what I’ve called, clumsily but urgently, a “baby die-off” — is underway.

The WarRoom/DailyClout Pfizer Documents Research Volunteers, a group of 3000 highly credentialled doctors, RNs, biostatisticians, medical fraud investigators, lab clinicians and research scientists, have been turning out report after report, as you may know, to tell the world what is in the 55,000 internal Pfizer documents which the FDA had asked a court to keep under wraps for 75 years.

By court order, these documents were forcibly disclosed. And our experts are serving humanity by reading through these documents and explaining them in lay terms. You can find all of the Volunteers’ reports on DailyClout.io.

The lies revealed are stunning.

The WarRoom/DailyClout Volunteers have confirmed:

that Pfizer (and thus the FDA) knew by December 2020 that the MRNA vaccines did not work — that they “waned in efficacy” and presented “vaccine failure.” One side effect of getting vaccinated, as they knew by one month after the mass 2020 rollout, was “COVID.”

Pfizer knew in May of 2021 that 35 minors’ hearts had been damaged a week after MRNA injection — but the FDA rolled out the EUA for teens a month later anyway, and parents did not get a press release from the US government about heart harms til August of 2021, after thousands of teens were vaccinated. [See this]

The following are some reports – a far from exhaustive list – of increased child injuries and deaths from the covid-19 injections.

In a previous article here we referenced an Expose article, from July 13, ’22, which said that the UK Government (Office of National Statistics) “admits COVID Vaccinated Children Are 4423% More Likely to Die of Any Cause & 13,633% more likely to Die of COVID-19 Than Unvaccinated Children” (emphasis added).

Steve Kirsch went through the statistics from the above article – which come from the official UK ONS site – and showed that children aged 10 to 14 are dying at a rate 45 times higher than normal. 

Kirsch’s article is here.

This article from the Daily Sceptic on September 10, ’22 tells us that 400 Doctors and Professionals have declared an International Medical Crisis “due to diseases and death associated with the ‘COVID-19 vaccines’“. Their Declaration states:

The large number of sudden deaths in previously healthy young people who were inoculated with these ‘vaccines’ is particularly worrying, as is the high incidence of miscarriages and perinatal deaths which have not been investigated.

A large number of adverse side effects, including hospitalisations, permanent disabilities and deaths related to the so-called ‘COVID-19 vaccines’, have been reported officially.

The registered number has no precedent in world vaccination history.

Examining the reports on CDC’s VAERS, the U.K.’s Yellow Card System, the Australian Adverse Event Monitoring System, Europe’s EudraVigilance System and the WHO’s VigiAccess Database, to date there have been more than 11 million reports of adverse effects and more than 70,000 deaths co-related to the inoculation of the products known as ‘Covid vaccines’.

We know that these numbers just about represent between 1% and 10% of all real events.

In this article the team at Expose outline how they have

forced the Scottish Government to launch a country-wide investigation into why so many newborn baby deaths have occurred across the country since Government & Health Officials outrageously claimed the Covid-19 vaccine was safe for pregnant women without any evidence to back up those claims whatsoever.

They also show that the rush to get everyone vaccinated meant that despite the fact that,

The UK Government clearly stated in the official ‘REG 174 INFORMATION FOR UK HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS‘ document prepared upon emergency authorisation of the Pfizer mRNA Covid-19 injection that the Pfizer jab was not recommended for use during pregnancy, pregnancy should be ruled out prior to vaccination, and women of childbearing age should avoid pregnancy for at least 2 months after their second dose.

[…]

At the end of April 2021, the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) formally recommended that all pregnant women should be offered the Pfizer Covid-19 injection, despite the fact no studies had been performed to prove the safety of administering the injection during pregnancy (Bold emphasis added).

Our own HSE has made the same recommendation.

In this article in The Expose, figures taken from The European Mortality Monitoring Project show that “Europe has suffered a record-breaking number of Excess Deaths in 2022 & it’s because so many Children & Young Adults are “mysteriously” dying“. (Bold emphasis added)

The Expose again here tells us that

[a]new study conducted by scientists from several respected institutions across Germany & Switzerland has discovered that 1 in every 99 Covid-19 vaccination children aged 5 and under require emergency care or hospitalisation. (Bold emphasis added)

The scientists also found that the risk of children requiring emergency care or hospitalisation following Covid-19 vaccination was 117% higher than the average risk following vaccination with any other type of vaccine.

And here, the Expose shows that according to OFFICIAL CDC FIGURES [there are] – 58k Children injured, 15k hospitalised, 1.2k disabled & 163 dead due to COVID-19 Vaccination in the USA.

MORE DAMNING EVIDENCE OF CRIMES BY PFIZER AND MODERNA

I include a large detailed section of the following article, from June 13, 2022, as it vividly demonstrates the callous and criminal disregard for babies and children shown by these pharmaceutical companies and their decision makers & enablers, including government agencies. It is an unsettling read.

The article is headed by the following statement from Global Research editor, Michel Chossudovsky:

Read carefully. Pfizer is committing crimes against humanity, specifically against our children.

The vaccine has resulted in cardiac arrest not in an elderly person but in a two month old baby.

“Why did they not follow up on the 2-month-old baby’s condition, after going into cardiac arrest an hour after receiving an experimental vaccine? Why is there no further information? Is it because he died? Or was the baby removed from an experiment? Why would the author of the report not mention this?”

We call upon the US Department of Justice to undertake a criminal investigation against Pfizer.

We call upon governments worldwide to immediately suspend the mRNA vaccine.

A class action law suit is also required on behalf of the hundreds of thousands of victims of the mRNA vaccine.

Never mentioned by the media, Pfizer has a criminal record with the US Department of Justice.

In 2009 Pfizer was indicted on charges of “fraudulent marketing”.

In the article titled, Pfizer Crimes against our Children: Cardiac Arrest of Two Month Old Baby an Hour after Experimental Vaccine, the authors, Ranit Feinberg and Raffa Shir-Raz tell us that:

An analysis of VAERS reports shows that contrary to the FDA’s briefing document claiming that the majority of adverse events in Pfizers’ clinical trial were non-serious – at least 58 cases of life-threatening side effects in infants under 3 years old who received mRNA vaccines were reported. For some, it is unclear if they survived. It is also unclear why the infants were vaccinated, and whether they were part of the clinical trials. However, in the upcoming FDA meeting on Wednesday, the FDA will not be able to argue it did not know

“Chest pain; cardiac arrest; Skin cold clammy”. This short description of a cardiac arrest, which occurred one hour after receiving a Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, is taken from the VAERS system – the US Vaccine Adverse Eve Reporting System ( case number 1015467), and it does not refer to an elderly person, nor to a young adult, or even a teenager. It is hard to believe, but this report refers to a two-month-old baby.

[…]

How did a 2-month-old baby receive the mRNA vaccine? These vaccines have not yet received EUA (Emergency Use Authorization) for approved use in children ages five and under by the FDA, or any other regulatory authority, and even if it will, the EUA will only include babies 6 months and older.

Was this baby a participant in Pfizer-BioNTech’s clinical trials, testing efficacy and safety among babies?

The answer is unclear.

The authors ask “Why did they not follow up on the 2-month-old baby’s condition, after going into cardiac arrest an hour after receiving an experimental vaccine? Why is there no further information? Is it because he died? Or was the baby removed from an experiment? Why would the author of the report not mention this?” They say that this incident is not isolated but is one of many on the VAERS system of babies and toddlers who were vaccinated and suffered life threatening adverse reactions.

Even though children under five were not considered eligible for these vaccines unless they were part of a clinical trial, astonishingly, it appears that there are many reports in the system describing babies and toddlers who were vaccinated. Some of the children suffered from life-threatening adverse events. In some cases, it is not clear what happened to them; did they survive and recover, do they still suffer from health problems, or did they die.

Feinberg’s and Shir-Raz’s article was written just a couple of days before the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee met to consider Pfizer’s and Moderna’s requests for EUA for their respective vaccines for infants and toddlers aged 6 months to 4 years, the only group not eligible for COVID-19 vaccination at that time. They continue:

In light of [the] expected approval, RT Magazine conducted an analysis of the cases reported in the VAERS system referring to babies up to 3 years old.

During the analysis, cases were removed in which it was stated that the exposure to the vaccine was through breastfeeding (these cases were analyzed separately and will soon be presented in a follow-up article), as well as cases that were identified as errors in the age registration.

The analysis shows there were at least 58 cases of severe and life-threatening adverse reactions among babies and toddlers 3 years old and younger. This finding is especially puzzling considering the fact that they weren’t supposed to be vaccinated at this age to begin with. Sadly, similarly to the case reported above, most VAERS reports do not indicate how and under which circumstances they were exposed to the vaccine – were they participants in the companies’ trials? And if not, why and in which circumstances were they vaccinated?

Both companies have not yet released the safety data from their trials on this age group. However, one thing is clear from the VAERS reports: there were many babies who were injured after receiving the vaccine. Whether they were vaccinated in the trials or illegally in their communities, Pfizer and Moderna will defiantly (sic) not be able to claim, when presenting their data to the FDA, that the vaccine is safe for babies, and that there weren’t any severe adverse events in this age group. Moreover, the FDA’s committee experts who will discuss the EUA approval will not be able to ignore those cases and argue that they did not know. The data presented in this article demonstrate beyond any doubt the complete opposite, and this time – these data are presented to the public in advance, before the EUA is granted and ahead of the VRBPAC discussion.

The authors discuss whatever details are available relating to outcomes of these ‘tests’.

One of the most chilling reports (report no. 1133837) refers to a 43 day old baby who was given a single intramuscular dose of comirnaty. This baby suffered a variety of life-threatening, multi-system injuries almost immediately after the vaccination. These include:

“Anaphylactic reaction (broad), Asthma/bronchospasm (narrow), Anticholinergic syndrome (broad), Acute central respiratory depression (broad), Pulmonary hypertension (broad), Cardiomyopathy (broad), Eosinophilic pneumonia (broad), Vestibular disorders (broad), Hypersensitivity (broad), Respiratory failure (narrow), Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome (broad)“

They say that the section on ‘death’ reports ‘no’ and the section on ‘recovery’ reports ‘no’. So, the baby has not died and has not recovered. What happened to her? Is she alive or did she die?

The authors go on to point out that in most of the reported cases several life-threatening consequences were recorded for the same baby.

They discuss another baby, 2 months old, who also experienced anaphylactic shock plus an array of multi system symptoms (report no. 976433) following a single dose of the Pfizer-BionTech vaccine. It was stated that the vaccine was administered ”via an unspecified route of administration” and it wasn’t clear from the report if she was part of Pfizer’s clinical trial. As with the previous baby, the section on death reports ‘no’ but in the report description it says: “The patient had not recovered from the event. No follow-up attempts possible. No further information expected”.

The authors mention a number of other cases where following severe and life-threatening adverse reactions no further meaningful information was forthcoming: “the case of a 6-month-old baby (report # 2084418) who “received bnt162b2 (COMIRNATY), intramuscular” on December 29, 2021, and went through anaphylactic shock, anticholinergic syndrome, Neuroleptic syndrome, infectious pneumonia, other infections, and multi-system symptoms.” In this case the “section reporting death states “No”, meaning supposedly the baby did not die, while in the event description it says “outcome ‘unknown’… No follow-up attempts are possible. No further information is expected”.

Two more cases are mentioned, one of them particularly shocking, both suffering serious adverse effects. However, in the report summary of the first case it says: “No follow-up attempts are possible” and in the second more serious case the report says the result is “unknown” and that “No follow-up attempts are possible. No further information is expected”.

In some cases it is stated that they are not part of a clinical trial and in some it is not stated whether they were part of a clinical trial or whether they were vaccinated in some other unknown circumstances. But, the authors say,

whether they were part of the trial or not, the report does not explain the absence of this critical information; what happened to these babies? Did they survive? And if so, did they recover? Why was there not a follow-up on the medical condition of babies who suffered from severe and life-threatening adverse events, while it was clearly stated that they did not recover? Is it not required in such severe cases by the FDA that the company should make every effort to locate these babies, find out what their condition is and follow up on them?

In mid June 2022 the Pfizer vaccine received EUA for children from 6 months to 4 years and the Moderna vaccine for children from 6 months to 5 years.

On October 25, ’22 the CDC in the U.S. voted to add COVID-19 mRNA shots to the recommended childhood vaccine schedule by a unanimous vote of 15-0.

The behaviour described above is not anomalous and certainly not new. Vaccines and vaccine trials have been associated with crime, injury and death throughout the world for some time now – see here for some case reports. Below are some details of harmful trials/experiments in three countries stretching back decades.

Nigeria, The U.S. and Ireland

Nigeria: Pfizer’s controversial drug trial.

In 1996, during Africa’s worst ever meningitis epidemic, Pfizer conducted a comparative test in which one hundred children were given Trovan, an experimental oral antibiotic, and a different group of one hundred were given ceftriaxone, described as the ‘gold-standard’ treatment of modern medicine. Five from the Trovan group died and 6 from the ceftriaxone group. It was claimed that the children’s parents had not given informed consent for the trial involving an experimental drug and that the children were simply picked out of a line of families waiting outside a hospital for treatment. Questions were also raised over the record-keeping of the trial.

In 2020 Pfizer announced a $75 million settlement with Nigeria’s Kano state government thereby resolving claims that the pharmaceutical company bore responsibility for the death or disabling of dozens of the children in the study. $35 million will go towards a fund for trial participants, $30 million will go to health care initiatives in Kano and $10 million will be used to cover the state’s legal costs. The state for its part agreed to drop all civil and criminal charges against Pfizer which has always argued that the deaths and injuries were caused by meningitis and not its drugs.

Children as collateral damage, toxic drugs & billions in profits

In The Real Anthony Fauci¹, Robert F. Kennedy jr. tells us:

During the nearly four decades since Dr. Anthony Fauci took the agency’s reins, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) has often treated America’s most vulnerable children as collateral damage in its director’s single-minded pursuit of profitable pharmacological solutions for steadily declining public health. AZT’s sketchy and corrupt path to regulatory approval in 1988 blazed a trail for a multibillion-dollar boom in new HIV drugs, and Dr. Fauci gave broad leeway to his pharmaceutical partners and their PIs to conduct unethical human experimentation that exposed both children and adults to toxic compounds. (Kennedy, op. cit., 243)

Kennedy says holocaust survivor, Vera Sharav, told him that “[b]eginning around 1990, clinical trials became the profit center for the medical community. […] Everybody involved was making money except the subjects of the human experiments. At the center of everything was NIH and NIAID. While people were not paying attention, the agency quietly became the partner of the industry” (op. cit., 245) In his quest to develop a second generation of profitable AIDS drugs, Anthony Fauci’s NIAID conducted experiments on hundreds of HIV-positive foster children at Incarnation Children’s Center and numerous other facilities in New York city and in six other states between 1988 and 2002. Journalist Liam Scheff says Fauci’s NIAID and his big Pharma partners tortured and abused Black and Hispanic foster kids in unsupervised drug and vaccine studies. In relation to Incarnation Children’s Center he says,

This former convent houses a revolving stable of children who’ve been removed from their own homes by the Agency for Child Services [ACS]. These children are Black, Hispanic, and poor. Many of their mothers had a history of drug abuse and have died. Once taken into ICC, the children bevcame subjects of drug trials sponsored by [Dr. Anthony Fauci’s] NIAID (National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Disease, a division of the NIH), NICHD (the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development) in conjunction with some of the world’s largest pharmaceutical companies-GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Genentech, Chiron/Biocine and others. […] The drugs being given to the children are toxic-they’re known to cause genetic mutation, organ failure, bone marrow death, bodily deformations, brain damage and fatal skin disorders.15 If the children refuse the drugs, they’re held down and force fed. If the children continue to resist, they’re taken to Columbia Presbyterian hospital, where a surgeon puts a plastic tube through their abdominal wall into their stomachs. From then on, the drugs are injected directly into their intestines.16 (Kennedy, op. cit., 246)

In 2004 the BBC hired investigative reporter Celia Farber to conduct field research for their documentary film, Guinea Pig Kids which “chronicles the savage barbarity of Dr. Fauci’s science projects from the perspective of the affected children [and] exposes the dark underside of Big Pharma’s stampede to develop lucrative new AIDS remedies.“ (Kennedy, op. cit, 247) Farber related the following to Robert F. Kennedy jr.:

I found the mass grave at Gate of Heaven cemetery in Hawthorne, New York. I couldn’t believe my eyes. It was a very large pit with AstroTurf thrown over it, which you could actually lift up. Under it one could see dozens of plain wooden coffins, haphazardly stacked. There may have been 100 of them. I learned there was more than one child’s body in each. Around the pit was a semi-circle of several large tombstones on which upward of one thousand children’s names had been engraved. I wrote down every name. I’m still wondering who the rest of those kids were. As far as I know, nobody has ever asked Dr. Fauci that haunting question.

I remember the teddy bears and hearts in piles around the pit and I recall the flies buzzing around. The job of recording all those names took all day. NIAID, New York, and all the hospital PIs were stonewalling us. We couldn’t get any accurate estimate of the number of children who died in the NIAID experiments. or who they were. I went to check the gravestone names against death certificates at the NYC Department of Health, which you could still do at the time. BBC wanted to match these coffins to the names of children who were known to have been at ICC. It was a very slow, byzantine project with tremendous institutional resistance, but we did turn up a few names. We learned the story of a father who had come out of prison looking for his son. He was told his son had died at ICC of AIDS and there were no medical records, as they’d all been ‘lost in a fire.’ He was devastated. This story ran in the NY Post, believe it or not. But one after the other, every media outlet that touched this story got cold feet. Even then, the medical cartel had this power to kill this kind of story. Dr. Fauci has built his career on that attitude. Nobody even asks him a follow-up question. NIAID’s narrative, at that time, was that these children were among the doomed as they ‘had AIDS,’ so supposedly they were all going to die anyway. When people died, in large numbers, gruesome deaths, NIAID’s medical researchers called it ‘lesson learned.’

Chapter 7 of The Real Anthony Fauci is a harrowing read and has much detail on human suffering, amoral indifference and immoral & criminal behaviour. The Vera Institute’s Annual Report in 2009 which had been commissioned by the NYC Administration of Child Services (ACS) “investigated a twenty year period during which Dr. Fauci’s NIAID experiments endangered predominatly African American and Latino children in foster care by subjecting them to toxic Phase I and Phase II AIDS drug and vaccine experiments-mostly without parental consent and without the protection of an independent advocate.” (Kennedy, op. cit., 251) The following are among its findings:

• eighty of the 532 children who participated in clinical trials or observational studies died while in foster care;

• twenty-five of the children died while enrolled in a medication trial;

• sixty four children participated in thirty medication trials that were NOT REVIEWED by a special medical advisory panel, as the city’s policy required;

• and twenty-one children participated in trials that the panel had reviewed but had NOT RECOMMENDED.

• (In both cases, thirteen of the enrollments occurred before the children were placed in foster care.) (Kennedy, op. cit., 251, 252)

Vera Sharav has shown where the root of the rot lies: “Beginning around 1990, clinical trials became the profit center for the medical community. […] Everybody involved was making money except the subjects of the human experiments. At the center of everything was NIH and NIAID. While people were not paying attention, the agency quietly became the partner of the industry” (Kennedy, op. cit., 245)

Vaccine Trials on the powerless in Ireland

According to the Final Report of the Commission of Investigation into Mother and Baby Homes in Ireland there were 13 vaccine trials involving over 43,000 children in Ireland between 1922 and 1998. The commission found that these trials would have been a breach of the Nuremberg Code. Unfortunately, because of the lack of records it is not possible to conclusively determine if the vaccine trials were the cause of injuries and/or deaths.

A report in Irishcentral.com tells us:

The untried vaccine program was led in Ireland by the distinguished leading biologist Professor Patrick Meenan, who was also a key government advisor on the issue. He later stated: “There was a tradition of doing testing in orphanages. You went to where the material was to put it crudely.”

[…]

Trials were carried out on infants in thirteen mother and child homes. The commission investigating the vaccine issue found that until 1987 the legal status of the unmarried mothers there was simply “illegitimate” giving them no rights in law.

The commission found that “where the children who were subjected to vaccine trials were accompanied in the institutions by their mothers, the mother was the person whose consent should have been sought”.

However, it said that in “no case is there evidence that consent of the birth mother was properly sought or received.” (Bold emphasis added)

It is important to note that, along with their mothers, the children in these institutions were also classed as ‘illegitimate’ and had no advocate or personal representative aside from their ‘illegitimate’ mothers whose consent was neither sought or received; they were essentially powerless and at the mercy of those who ran the homes. According to this report in The Irish Examiner,

None of the mothers — some of whom were as young as 15 — involved appears to have given consent for their children to be involved in the trials.

Some of the mothers involved were known to have “mental health issues” or “psychiatric disorders”.

In addition, a number of the infants involved did not have their mothers with them at the time they were involved in the trials.

[…]

The commission stated: “It is clear that there was not compliance with the relevant regulatory and ethical standards of the time.

“Consent was not obtained from either the mothers of the children or their guardians and the necessary licences were not in place.

“There is no evidence of injury to the children involved as a result of the vaccines.”

At least one child is known to have died of cardiac and respiratory failure two weeks after receiving the first injection in one of the vaccine trials.

The commission said: “The available medical records do not suggest that this child’s death was in any way linked to the vaccine.”

Mari Steed, who was part of a ‘4 in 1’ (anti diptheria, polio, tetanus and whooping cough) vaccine trial as an infant in 1960 disputes the statement that “There is no evidence of injury to the children involved as a result of the vaccines.” Speaking to RTE News she said, “How would they know? I was never followed up after I was sent to the US.

My adoptive parents didn’t know I’d been used in a trial. I’ve never been offered any screening by the State (or the Commission) to see if my current health at age 60 has been affected.”

The same RTE News report says:

The Commission found that the trials in seven institutions it investigated were illegal and unethical even by the standards of the time.

It said scientists lacked the correct research licences and failed to comply with contemporary regulatory standards.

The report concludes that these trials would have been a basic breach of the Nuremberg Code, following the trial of Nazi doctors accused of conducting murderous and torturous human experiments in the Nazi concentration camps during World War II.

The existence of a trial at Bessborough of an experimental ‘5 in 1’ vaccine (anti diphtheria, polio, tetanus, whooping cough and measles), first reported by RTÉ’s Prime Time, has been confirmed by the Commission.

Philip Delaney, whose vaccine records suggest he was part of this trial, told RTÉ: “How do they know there were no ill effects?

“We don’t even know which infants were involved in this trial.”

On page 1998 the Commission Report says:

Mortality rates in each of the institutions were very high in the period compared to the overall national rate of infant mortality. Even compared to other locations where infant mortality was relatively high among the general population, such as Dublin City, rates of infant deaths were substantially higher in these institutions.

On pages 2008 and 2009 the Report details the deaths by age, institution and decade. The total number of deaths across the six institutions listed, from 1920 until 1990, is 6,902. By institution the death figures are: Bessborough – 904; Bethany – 259; Castlepollard – 234; Pelletstown – 3512; Sean Ross Abbey – 1061; Tuam – 932.

Because of the lack of records and follow-up checks it is not possible to say if deaths and/or injuries in the Mother and Baby Homes were caused by the vaccines administered in the trials.

That the trials were illegal and unethical, that “the scientists involved lacked the correct research licences and failed to comply with contemporary regulatory standards” and that the “trials would have been a basic breach of the Nuremberg Code, following the trial of Nazi doctors accused of conducting murderous and torturous human experiments in the Nazi concentration camps during World War II” is beyond question.

The treatment of the mothers and their children in these homes was another example of abuse of the most vulnerable in our society by government, religious institutions and medical personnel working in tandem with pharmaceutical companies.

According to Children’s Health Defense, in the U.S.“[D]espite immense blowback, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) voted unanimously to add COVID-19 injections to its recommended schedule of vaccinations for infants, children and adolescents. The committee members’ votes solidify their steadfast loyalty to protecting pharma profits at the cost of children’s lives. This is the first step to   permanent, blanket liability protection for all current and future COVID-19 injections.

This is a declaration of war on our children”

In Ireland, despite mounting evidence of deaths and injuries, our Health Service Executive (HSE) continues to recommend the covid-19 ‘vaccine‘ for children from 6 months upwards and for pregnant women and nursing mothers.

In The Real Anthony Fauci, Robert F. Kennedy jr. tells us,

“In 1973, Dr. Stanley Plotkin penned a letter to the New England Journal of Medicine in which he justified his experiments on vulnerable intellectually disabled children saying they are ‘humans in form but not in social potential‘. Those sorts of prejudices did nothing to damage his lofty reputation among his colleagues. Vaccinologists consider the annual Stanley Plotkin Award the Nobel Prize of vaccinology. In 2019, the British Medical Journal called Plotkin ‘the Godfather of vaccines’.” (Kennedy, op. cit., 243) (Bold emphasis added)

Yuval Noah Harari, see here and here, says that the products of the second industrial revolution, which is imminent, will be humans themselves or, more specifically, bodies and minds. He says that those who are not part of the revolution, who can not produce bodies, brains and minds, will become extinct. Because those who are part of the revolution can produce bodies, brains and minds with the consequence that cheap labour will simply count for nothing, the biggest question in politics and economics will be what to do with all these useless, meaningless and worthless people, or useless eaters.

If this mechanistic and utilitarian understanding of what it means to be a human person, as expressed by Harari & Plotkin and clearly acted on by many others, continues to hold sway humanity is in grave danger. Resistance is not an option, it is an imperative.