The EU: Digital Prison Builder
Image by Bet-Noire via istock
The Global Digital Prison is in a hyper-construction phase as the social control agenda moves ahead apace.
On June 5 The European Commission and the WHO announced the launch of their Digital Health Partnership. The WHO’s announcement on their website says “The European Commission and WHO launch landmark digital health initiative to strengthen global health security.”
Can we survive and thrive as human persons in such a world? Are we truly human if our freedom is constrained: our freedom to roam, to transact, to express ourselves, our right to bodily autonomy and, crucially, our right to privacy? Covid 19 restrictions, including the EU vaccine passport, were used to limit and reduce all the above freedoms and to test and demonstrate rates of compliance. Are we willing to accept such a world for our children and grandchildren? Can we and future generations flourish as truly free human persons in such a world?
In a TLAV article, Derrick Broze tells us that:
With the latest announcement that the European Commission and the World Health Organization are partnering on a Digital Vaccine Passport the Technocratic State is coming into view. On Monday the European Commission and the World Health Organization announced a “digital health” partnership to establish a new Digital Vaccine Passport system for the world. The announcement by the EU and the WHO notes that the new digital identity scheme is building on the work of the EU Digital COVID Certificate which was enacted in June 2021 during the COVID-19 panic and is set to expire on June 30. According to the EU, more than 2.3 billion certificates were issued.
In a section on the WHO website titled, A global WHO system building on EU legacy
we read:
One of the key elements in the European Union’s work against the COVID-19 pandemic has been digital COVID-19 certificates. To facilitate free movement within its borders, the EU swiftly established interoperable COVID-19 certificates (entitled ‘EU Digital COVID-19 Certificate’ or ‘EU DCC’). Based on open- source technologies and standards it allowed also for the connection of non- EU countries that issue certificates according to EU DCC specifications, becoming the most widely used solution around the world.
(Members of both the European Commission and the WHO are appointed so neither are democratic institutions.)
In early 2021, the standard answer I received when appealing to MEPs to vote against the proposal for an EU Digital Covid-19 Certificate, was that its purpose was to facilitate travel only, so any concerns as to it leading to discrimination against the unvaccinated were unfounded and irrelevant. Was this naivety or stupidity? Unlikely in my view, far more likely that their shallow and insincere, virtue-signalling morality had found a suitable space in which to express itself.
The unelected European Commission issues directives that Ireland is bound to follow. According to Thompson Reuters Practical Law, a directive is:
A legal instrument of the European Union (EU) as defined in Article 288 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). A directive is a measure of general application that is binding as to the result to be achieved, but that leaves member states discretion as to how to achieve the result. Directives usually contain a deadline by which EU member states must implement it into national law (usually two years).
The European Commission, an ‘instrument’ of the EU, the club of which Ireland is a member, is collaborating with the WHO in building our digital prison. It is important to note that the WHO is a specialized agency of the United Nations with responsibility for international public health. The prison builders and managers are coming into view.
In a substack article titled What’s next to the Moon? and subtitled An “Apex body” and Digital ID to rule us all, Jacob Nordångard PhD discusses three new Policy Briefs recently published by the United Nations ““to provide more detail on certain proposals contained in Our Common Agenda“ – The UN Secretary-General’s vision for the future of global cooperation.“ These Policy Briefs are, A Global Digital Compact, Reforms to the International Financial Architecture and The Future of Outer Space Governance
and, according to Nordångard, they set out a chilling course for our future.
Among the proposals is:
a new “apex body” in charge of the entire financial system that will “enhance its coherence and align its priorities with the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.” This could, according to Secretary-General António Guterres, be done through a “Biennial Summit between the Group of 20, Economic and Social Council, the Secretary-General, and heads of international financial institutions.”This will further integrate the G20 with the United Nations into a body that can be described as an economic Security Council. It also seems like a perfect nest for the “apex predators” that runs the international banking system.” (bold emphasis added)
A new body “in charge of the entire financial system that will “enhance its coherence and align it priorities with the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development”” is indeed a chilling development, more like a ‘climate action’ financial policeman.
The expression, ‘Sustainable Development’, is an example of Newspeak and does not mean what we might think. According to Rosa Koire, late of Democrats Against U.N. Agenda 21, Sustainable Development
is NOT about recycling or making sure there’s enough food and resources for everyone. It’s about moving populations from rural and suburban areas into concentrated city centers where they and their use of resources can be monitored and controlled.
It is:
the blueprint, the comprehensive plan of action for the 21st century to inventory and control all land, all water, all plants, all minerals, all animals, all construction, all means of production, all energy, all law enforcement, all health care, all food, all education, all information, and all human beings in the world.
Sustainable Development is Technocracy in action. You will find more on Sustainable Development here, here and here.
Nordångard tells us that digital connectivity and the establishment of a Global Digital Compact is a vital part of this agenda.
This can be described as a cybernetic organ, consisting of a digitally connected network of people, entities, devices, and things, that easily can be directed by those who run the system. In the Policy Brief it is for example explained how digitisation will help to achieve the global goals. […] A Digital ID is a cornerstone in this work and is among other things seen as a way to reduce poverty.
He quotes a UN Secretary-General’s High-level Panel on Digital Cooperations report, Age of Digital Interdependence, from 2019 which warns of some potential risks:
A digital ID can help unlock new opportunities but can also introduce new risks and challenges. They can be used to undermine human rights – for example, by enabling civil society to be targeted, or selected groups to be excluded from social benefits.
Nordångard lays out some of those new risks and challenges:
Will you get your social protection coverage if you don’t comply with vaccinations or other measures introduced to achieve the SDGs? Probably not. This can later be fused with a social credit system and Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) – which is now being introduced and tested in many countries across the world. To receive your daily bread you have to obey and accept the instructions from the Masters that run the show. If the UN declares a “Planetary Emergency” this will have severe consequences for our freedoms (as we experienced during the pandemic).
The Digital Health Partnership between the European Commission and the WHO is intended to lead to a Digital Vaccine Passport system for the world. A Global Digital Compact “described as a cybernetic organ, consisting of a digitally connected network of people, entities, devices, and things, that easily can be directed by those who run the system“ will be introduced.
CBDCs are being introduced carefully and by degrees so their use becomes normalised and accepted. This piece by Professor Bill Willers is a clear and chilling outline of the step-by-step normalisation of CBDCs:
On April 10, 2023, at a meeting of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the Digital Currency Monetary Authority (DCMA) [and who the hell gave them authority?] launched an International CBDC called the “Unicoin”, a “universal monetary unit [that] strengthens the monetary sovereignty of participating central banks”. And a mere 4 weeks earlier (March 6), the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), aka “the Central Bank for central banks”, concluded a multi- country study, Project Icebreaker, regarding the use of cross-currency/cross- border financial transactions using CBDCs. Both, designed to protect the stability of central banks, are moves toward a single global electronic currency.
Reestablishing a presence on the moon (Lunar Gateway), developing a base a the south pole of the moon and conducting a manned mission to Mars (SpaceX) are envisioned as part of the The Future of Outer Space Governance. Nordångard says
these “space-based opportunities” also highlight the “important link between outer space and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development” with the importance of satellite surveillance to “track deforestation, monitor protected areas for illegal poaching and fishing and assess biodiversity changes” as well as track our every move through the global navigation satellite systems.
We are facing intense top-down, digitally managed control of most aspects of our lives: our health, our right to privacy, our ability to transact privately, our sovereignty and our freedom; these are the very foundation of what it means to be a human person and we simply cannot lose them. If we love and appreciate ‘humanness’ and if we love our children this agenda must be resisted and pushed back while we also plan and prepare so that we and our children & grandchildren can continue to live free, flourishing, private and truly human lives. The UN, WHO and the EU (specifically the unelected European Commission) are major players in this endeavour. Whatever the benefits of being a member of the EU, we, in Ireland, are paying and will continue to pay a significant price for that ‘privilege’. We have, of our own volition, accepted recolonization.
For more detail on the Digital Health Partnership see the article by Mercola here.
For more detail on the plans for CBDC and the intention to end anonymity see here, here and here.
